Hull City’s Liam Rosenior explained why referee Darren Bond could not be blamed, as he claimed the red card ‘incident’ was a huge blunder…

Hull City’s Liam Rosenior expressed discontent over a pivotal red card that impacted their 3-1 defeat against an unnamed opponent. Despite acknowledging that referee Darren Bond may have perceived the incident differently, Rosenior emphasized the need to appeal Tyler Morton’s dismissal, arguing that it was a mistake and not deserving of a three-game suspension.

The red card incident occurred 35 minutes into the game when Morton tackled Djeidi Gassma. Sky’s extensive camera coverage, including an angle presented from Bond’s perspective, suggested a two-footed and high challenge. However, Rosenior contended that Morton’s studs were low and his trailing leg was not involved, categorizing it as a yellow card offense in the current football climate.

Rosenior, while acknowledging the challenging nature of refereeing, stated his intention to discuss the matter with Bond. He refrained from being too critical, recognizing that everyone, including referees, makes mistakes. Expressing disappointment, he highlighted the impact of the red card on the game’s outcome, emphasizing the desire to send fans home happy.

Morton, described as an outstanding player by Rosenior, faced devastation in the dressing room over the suspension. The coach lamented the harshness of the decision, particularly as it coincided with Jean Michael Seri’s departure for the African Cup of Nations, leaving the team without key players.

Rosenior argued that, despite the red card, his team had managed to reach a competitive level after the initial minutes of the game. However, he contended that playing with ten men for 60 minutes in the midst of a busy schedule had a clear impact on the game’s dynamics.

Reflecting on the second half, where his tactical choices contributed to conceding three goals in quick succession, Rosenior took responsibility for the outcome. He explained that he had opted for a more aggressive, man-to-man approach, intending to press higher. While acknowledging the resulting defensive vulnerabilities, he justified the decision based on the team’s overall good performances, expressing a reluctance to adopt a defensive strategy of sitting back and inviting pressure.

In conclusion, Rosenior’s frustration centered on the controversial red card and its repercussions on the team’s performance, urging a reevaluation of the decision through the appeal process.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*