A proposed trade involving Chicago Blackhawks defenseman Seth Jones to the Edmonton Oilers, as suggested by ESPN’s Greg Wyshynski, has gained attention, but it’s highly unlikely to materialize—and for good reason. While Edmonton could use a top-four right-shot defenseman, acquiring Jones would present more problems than solutions.
First and foremost, Jones’ contract is a massive obstacle. He carries a hefty $9.25 million cap hit through the 2029-30 season, which would severely hamper the Oilers’ ability to address other critical needs. Edmonton already operates with limited cap flexibility, and taking on such a long-term financial commitment would make it nearly impossible for the team to manage other pressing concerns. Key players like Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl, and Evan Bouchard will soon need new contracts, and tying up cap space with Jones’ deal could create major headaches down the line.
Additionally, the Oilers already have a similar issue with defenseman Darnell Nurse’s substantial contract. Expecting Chicago to retain a portion of Jones’ salary isn’t realistic either, especially given that Jones still has several years remaining on his deal.
There’s also the question of Jones’ performance. Despite being a minute-eating defenseman, his minus-90 rating over 217 games with Chicago is the second-worst in the NHL during that period. It’s risky for Edmonton to assume that his struggles are solely due to the Blackhawks’ rebuilding phase. If Jones underperforms in Edmonton, the Oilers would be saddled with a costly, underachieving player.
Finally, Jones holds a full no-move clause, meaning he has the power to reject any trade. Even if the Oilers showed interest, Jones could simply refuse to leave Chicago, especially if he prefers to be part of the Blackhawks’ rebuild alongside future star Connor Bedard.
Ultimately, this potential deal doesn’t align with Edmonton’s current trajectory. Jones’ contract, recent underperformance, and trade-blocking power make this trade idea more fantasy than reality. The Oilers would be better off looking elsewhere to improve their defense without taking on unnecessary risks.
Leave a Reply