The Houston Texans are facing a critical offseason as they navigate the NFL Scouting Combine and prepare for the upcoming NFL Draft. Despite a strong showing last season, the team is facing the potential loss of key contributors to free agency. Running back Devin Singletary remains unsigned, and several defensive starters are due for contract negotiations. Among these players, edge rusher Jonathan Greenard stands out as a priority for the Texans.
Greenard had a standout season in 2023, leading the team in sacks, tackles for loss, and quarterback hits. His performance has put him in a strong position for a significant payday, but the Texans are eager to keep him on the team. According to Aaron Wilson, there is a “strong mutual interest” between Greenard and the Texans in extending their working relationship. Both parties are actively exploring the possibility of reaching a financial compromise, with Greenard’s projected contract value ranging from $16 million to $22 million.
However, the Texans may face competition from other teams interested in Greenard’s services. This could lead to a bidding war that may make it financially undesirable for the Texans to retain him, despite their ample salary cap space. Losing Greenard would leave a significant hole in the Texans’ defense, which could be challenging to fill through the draft or free agency.
While the Texans may have other priorities on defense, such as targeting Kansas City Chiefs defensive tackle Chris Jones or upgrading the secondary, retaining Greenard remains a key focus. His familiarity with the team and the intangibles he brings make him an essential part of the Texans’ defensive plans.
The Texans are facing a crucial offseason as they navigate the challenges of free agency and the NFL Draft. Retaining Greenard is a top priority, but they may face stiff competition from other teams. The decision ultimately comes down to whether the Texans are willing to engage in a bidding war to keep Greenard or if they will look to other options to fill the void on defense.
Leave a Reply